Friday, May 22, 2020

It s All About The Presentation - 1333 Words

It’s all About the Presentation The standard way of thinking about copyrights is that it only applies to books and movies; however, whether it applies to recipes is a topic that many chefs want to bring to light. Not many people think that copyrights apply to recipes. In the discussion about recipes, the issue is that the ingredients themselves cannot be copyrighted. The question is how can a person copyright a recipe. The names of ingredients and the labels can be copyrighted but the substance themselves cannot be. In recent discussions of copyright, the issue has been chefs copying others and calling it theirs; however, putting recipes under patents is ineffective because another chef could just omit an ingredient or add something to†¦show more content†¦In the article â€Å"The Plagiarism Problem,† Gavin Larson describes copying of other artists dance moves. Although this has nothing to do with food it brings up the topic of using inspiration or copying. La rson talks about the use of context and intention to differentiate whether it is inspiration or just plagiarism. Even though dance is a different type of art it still relates to the struggles of ownership. In the article â€Å"Something Borrowed,† Malcolm Gladwell describes his encounter with two ladies who are battling over intellectual property. The woman claiming theft is pointing out that her essence and words were stolen. Although this has nothing to do with recipes it does bring up intellectual property and who is the rightful owner. While researching copyrights throughout Lauren Markham’s â€Å"Meringue War† and Gavin Larsen’s â€Å"The Plagiarism Problems†, I observed the struggle between chefs within recipes and how it is similar to dancers and their performances. Based on my research of copyrights, I argue that this topic is significant because of the current uses of trademarks on food, the uses of specific plating as a form of art, and the use of branding the name of a dish such as the Cronut and needs further investigation on its effect on chef’s livelihood. Although copyrights may seem of concern to only a small group of foodie, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Comparing The Spiral Model And The Waterfall Model

1. Compare and contrast the spiral model and the waterfall model. What are the strengths of each? What are the weaknesses of each? Which is best for large projects and which is best for very small projects? Why is the waterfall model still relevant in software engineering? (Word Count: 300-400 words) In Water fall show the stages are executed under a consecutive stream. each new stage is prepared when finishing the past stage. This is a huge reason that any sudden changes are difficult to suit under waterfall model. Waterfall model is the most established model going to the focal points of waterfall model least arranging overhead for the steps that are to take after .in this model the exercises in every eliminate is conveyed forthright. It is attainable that one does not need to anticipate whole stage .the undertaking does not slip on its calendar. the quantity of assets taking a shot at this undertaking does not continue expanding drawbacks of waterfall model are powerlessness of rolling out improvements in the framework when once the framework prerequisites are solidified. Cannot backtrack to the past stage once when it is finished if the product improvement methodology reaches out for a more drawn out time of time there are risks that the product and equipment alternatives picked for the product may get to be out of date toward the end of the advancement process winding model was acquainted due with deficiency in the waterfall models in this process the wholeShow MoreRelatedThe Software Development Life Cycle Essay1884 Words   |  8 PagesThe waterfall method is a linear, sequential, non-iterative process for software development first mentioned by Herbert Benington in 1956. The software development life cycle (SDLC) is defined by Ruparelia as â€Å"a conceptual framework or process that considers the structure of the stages in-volved in the development of an application from its initial feasibility study through to its deploy-ment in the field and maintenance (Ruparelia, 2010, p. 8).’’ This method is so named â€Å"waterfall’’ because theRead MoreComparing Extreme Programming and Waterfall Project Results2695 Words   |  11 PagesComparing Extreme Programming and Waterfall Project Results Feng Ji Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley Campus Mountain View, CA, 94035 jojojifeng@gmail.com Todd Sedano Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley Campus Mountain View, CA, 94035 todd.sedano@sv.cmu.edu Abstract Waterfall and Extreme Programming are two software project methods used for project management. Although there are a number of opinions comparing the two methods regarding how they should be applied, noneRead MoreA Rubik s Cube Is A Logic Game And Mathematical Puzzle1455 Words   |  6 Pagesonly. Throughout the technologies section I have used information from sites reference [5] – [15] found in the appendix. A Software Development Process or Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model is put in place to help manage the resources and time you have available to complete a project. Each model will usually contain key planning, design and testing stages. If the project was being developed by a single person, with no time constraints or budget and the requirements from the customer weren’tRead MoreApplication Of An Information System1129 Words   |  5 Pagesall these methodologies are distinguished into two categories – Heavyweight or Lightweight. Heavyweight methodologies are also known as traditional methodologies which approach system development with standard, well-defined processes such as Waterfall, Spiral and Unified Process. Lightweight methodologies such as XP, SCRUM are known as the agile methodologies which focus on iterative cycles and are more able to adapt to changes. Each type of approach has its own recognized strength and weakness. NoRead MoreNet Present Valu e and Software Project Management1643 Words   |  7 Pagesii. Complexity iii. Conformity iv. Flexibility 1. ii, and iii only. 2. i, ii, and iii only. 3. i, and iv only. 4. ii, iii, and iv only. 5. i, ii, iii, and iv. 6. When producing a system in a project, different models can be chosen. The following are advantages of one of the process models: i.Large projects may benefit from the limited iteration process allowed ii.Logical flow aids in understanding iii.Sequential project processes are easier to plan and implement iv.Allows project completion timesRead MoreSdlc23489 Words   |  94 Pagestraditional approach. These approaches are as follows : (i) Waterfall : Linear framework type (ii) Prototyping : Iterative framework type (iii) Incremental : Combination of linear and iterative framework type (iv) Spiral : Combination linear and iterative framework type (v) Rapid Application Development (RAD) : Iterative Framework Type (vi) Agile Methodologies 2.3.1 The Traditional / Waterfall Approach / Sequential Approach: The waterfall approach is a traditional development approach in whichRead MoreMis Summary25465 Words   |  102 Pages Task 1 – Taxonomies of Information Systems Mastering the three worlds of information technology By Mc Afee 3 roles of executives in managing IT: 1) select technologies, 2) nurture adoption, 3) ensure their exploitation Building an Effective IT Model - IT in a historical context: IT is the latest in a series of general-purpose technologies (GPTs), innovations so important that they cause jumps in an economy’s normal march of progress. - GPTs deliver greater benefits as people invent or developRead MoreInformation Technology Project Management,31215 Words   |  125 PagesThese phases do not vary by project. Product life cycles vary tremendously based on the nature of the project. For example, the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) could follow the waterfall model, spiral model, incremental release model, prototyping model, RAD model, extreme programming model, or scrum model. Using the general phases of the SDLC (information systems planning, analysis, design, implementation, and support) there could be a project to develop a strategic information systems plan;

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Hr Case Crisis Study Free Essays

Human Resource Management Critical Incident Case on Trackon Couriers Pvt. Ltd Course Details Co Prepared By: Case on Trackon Couriers Pvt. Ltd Abstract: – The case discusses about the requirement for different management styles at different phase of an organisation and highlights a situation how once effective Managers can become a problem for the organisation if they are not trained and updated with changing environment and organisational goals. We will write a custom essay sample on Hr Case Crisis Study or any similar topic only for you Order Now Also, the case discusses about the requirement for performance parameters in all aspects of business. New Delhi – December 31st 2005 – Just returning after his regular badminton game Mr. P. K. Anand Managing Director and CEO of Trackon Couriers Pvt. Ltd was sweating in spite of five degree Celsius temperature outside. He had a very tuff decision to make – either to compromise on the company’s existence or to go against the interest of his once blue eyed boys. Obviously as an entrepreneur he wanted to save the company. Having taken the decision he wanted to decide on the strategy to be adopted, he had invited his colleagues for the New Year eve party which is also going to be an important meeting to decide in the company’s future. Company Back Ground: – Trackon Couriers Pvt. Ltd founded by Mr. Anand in December 2004 amidst of crisis in management of On-Dot Couriers Pvt. Ltd, headed by him. Mr. Anand erstwhile agent of DTDC Courier started On- Dot Couriers along with his business partner Mr. Dinesh Rautela in April’ 1993. Though it was though time to hold on to Business Mr. Anand sustained and made it a Limited Company in 1999 adding three more directors to the board Mr. Y. K. Dabas, Mr. P. K. Singh and Mr. Lokesh Anand younger brother of Mr. P. K. Anand. Shares of the Company were distributed as follows: – Mr. P. K. Anand 32 % Mr. Lokesh†¦ How to cite Hr Case Crisis Study, Papers